Federal Judge Blocks ICE From Re-Detaining Kilmar Ábrego García, Says Government Had No Real Deportation Plan
A Maryland judge ruled that ICE cannot re-arrest the Salvadoran national whose mistaken deportation became an immigration flashpoint, finding the administration pursued unworkable African deportation schemes while ignoring Costa Rica's standing refugee offer.
Feb 17, 2026, 09:06 PM

The federal courthouse in Greenbelt, Maryland, has become familiar territory for attorneys arguing over the fate of Kilmar Ábrego García — but Tuesday's ruling from U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis may have delivered the most consequential blow yet to the government's attempts to remove the Salvadoran national from the country.
Xinis ruled that Immigration and Customs Enforcement cannot re-detain Ábrego García because the statutory 90-day detention window has expired and the Trump administration has failed to present any workable deportation plan US judge says wrongfully deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia can’t be re-detainedaljazeera.com·SecondaryA United States federal judge has ruled that the administration of US President Donald Trump cannot re-detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who was wrongfully deported last year and who the federal government has sought to deport again. US District Judge Paula Xinis stated on Tuesday that a 90-day detention period had passed without the administration presenting a workable plan to deport Abrego Garcia, whose lawyers say he is being punished because his wrongful detention.... The decision strikes at the heart of a case that has become one of the most politically charged immigration disputes of the Trump era, pitting executive enforcement powers against judicial oversight and raising uncomfortable questions about whether immigration detention is being used as punishment rather than as a tool to facilitate removal.
The ruling hinges on a straightforward legal principle: immigration detention exists to facilitate deportation, not to punish US judge says wrongfully deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia can’t be re-detainedaljazeera.com·SecondaryA United States federal judge has ruled that the administration of US President Donald Trump cannot re-detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who was wrongfully deported last year and who the federal government has sought to deport again. US District Judge Paula Xinis stated on Tuesday that a 90-day detention period had passed without the administration presenting a workable plan to deport Abrego Garcia, whose lawyers say he is being punished because his wrongful detention.... When the government cannot demonstrate a realistic prospect of removal in the "reasonably foreseeable future," continued detention becomes constitutionally suspect. In Ábrego García's case, Xinis found the evidence overwhelming that no viable removal plan exists.
The government "made one empty threat after another to remove him to countries in Africa with no real chance of success," Xinis wrote US judge says wrongfully deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia can’t be re-detainedaljazeera.com·SecondaryA United States federal judge has ruled that the administration of US President Donald Trump cannot re-detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who was wrongfully deported last year and who the federal government has sought to deport again. US District Judge Paula Xinis stated on Tuesday that a 90-day detention period had passed without the administration presenting a workable plan to deport Abrego Garcia, whose lawyers say he is being punished because his wrongful detention.... "From this, the court easily concludes that there is no 'good reason to believe' removal is likely in the reasonably foreseeable future."
The case of Ábrego García reads like a legal thriller with no satisfying resolution. He entered the United States illegally in 2011 as a teenager and settled in Maryland, where he married a U.S. citizen and had a child . In 2019, an immigration judge determined that he could not be deported to El Salvador because he faced danger there from a gang that had threatened his family — a finding that should have shielded him from removal to his home country US judge says wrongfully deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia can’t be re-detainedaljazeera.com·SecondaryA United States federal judge has ruled that the administration of US President Donald Trump cannot re-detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who was wrongfully deported last year and who the federal government has sought to deport again. US District Judge Paula Xinis stated on Tuesday that a 90-day detention period had passed without the administration presenting a workable plan to deport Abrego Garcia, whose lawyers say he is being punished because his wrongful detention....
That protection proved worthless last year, when ICE officers detained Ábrego García and deported him to El Salvador despite the 2019 ruling. The government later acknowledged the deportation was carried out in error US judge says wrongfully deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia can’t be re-detainedaljazeera.com·SecondaryA United States federal judge has ruled that the administration of US President Donald Trump cannot re-detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who was wrongfully deported last year and who the federal government has sought to deport again. US District Judge Paula Xinis stated on Tuesday that a 90-day detention period had passed without the administration presenting a workable plan to deport Abrego Garcia, whose lawyers say he is being punished because his wrongful detention.... He was held in a Salvadoran facility known for overcrowding and allegations of abuse.
The mistaken deportation triggered a political firestorm. Democratic lawmakers, led by Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen, who personally visited Ábrego García in El Salvador, demanded his return . The case climbed to the Supreme Court, which ultimately ordered the administration to facilitate his repatriation. The Trump administration complied in June, but only after securing an indictment charging him with human smuggling in Tennessee — a move critics characterized as retaliatory US judge says wrongfully deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia can’t be re-detainedaljazeera.com·SecondaryA United States federal judge has ruled that the administration of US President Donald Trump cannot re-detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who was wrongfully deported last year and who the federal government has sought to deport again. US District Judge Paula Xinis stated on Tuesday that a 90-day detention period had passed without the administration presenting a workable plan to deport Abrego Garcia, whose lawyers say he is being punished because his wrongful detention....
The smuggling charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee. Ábrego García has pleaded not guilty to the charges US judge says wrongfully deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia can’t be re-detainedaljazeera.com·SecondaryA United States federal judge has ruled that the administration of US President Donald Trump cannot re-detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who was wrongfully deported last year and who the federal government has sought to deport again. US District Judge Paula Xinis stated on Tuesday that a 90-day detention period had passed without the administration presenting a workable plan to deport Abrego Garcia, whose lawyers say he is being punished because his wrongful detention.... The Trump administration has also accused him of being a member of the criminal group MS-13, though Al Jazeera reported that no evidence was offered to support that claim ICE cannot re-detain Kilmar Ábrego García, judge rulestheguardian.com·SecondaryCase became focal point for immigration after he was deported to El Salvador where he faces gang threats Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) cannot re-detain Kilmar Ábrego García because a 90-day detention period has expired and the government has no viable plan for deporting him, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday. The Salvadorian national’s case has become a focal point in the immigration debate after he was mistakenly deported to his home country last year.. A 2019 Maryland police report and a 2018 court filing did flag a possible MS-13 connection.
Since his return to the United States, the administration has pursued what Xinis characterized as a series of implausible deportation schemes. Court filings show the Department of Homeland Security explored sending Ábrego García to Uganda, Eswatini, Ghana, and Liberia — a list of destinations that the judge found lacked any serious prospect of acceptance US judge says wrongfully deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia can’t be re-detainedaljazeera.com·SecondaryA United States federal judge has ruled that the administration of US President Donald Trump cannot re-detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who was wrongfully deported last year and who the federal government has sought to deport again. US District Judge Paula Xinis stated on Tuesday that a 90-day detention period had passed without the administration presenting a workable plan to deport Abrego Garcia, whose lawyers say he is being punished because his wrongful detention....
Perhaps the most pointed element of Xinis's ruling was her observation about Costa Rica. The Central American nation has consistently offered to accept Ábrego García as a refugee, an offer that his legal team says he is willing to accept . Yet the administration has, in Xinis's words, "purposely — and for no reason — ignored the one country that has consistently offered to accept Abrego Garcia as a refugee, and to which he agrees to go" US judge says wrongfully deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia can’t be re-detainedaljazeera.com·SecondaryA United States federal judge has ruled that the administration of US President Donald Trump cannot re-detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who was wrongfully deported last year and who the federal government has sought to deport again. US District Judge Paula Xinis stated on Tuesday that a 90-day detention period had passed without the administration presenting a workable plan to deport Abrego Garcia, whose lawyers say he is being punished because his wrongful detention....
The government's position frames the dispute quite differently. Homeland Security officials have argued that Ábrego García should have been deported long ago and that the judiciary is effectively preventing enforcement agencies from carrying out their core mission US judge says wrongfully deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia can’t be re-detainedaljazeera.com·SecondaryA United States federal judge has ruled that the administration of US President Donald Trump cannot re-detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who was wrongfully deported last year and who the federal government has sought to deport again. US District Judge Paula Xinis stated on Tuesday that a 90-day detention period had passed without the administration presenting a workable plan to deport Abrego Garcia, whose lawyers say he is being punished because his wrongful detention.... From the administration's perspective, Ábrego García is not merely a bureaucratic mistake to be corrected — he is someone who entered the country illegally, was flagged in connection with MS-13, and was later indicted on smuggling charges. Supporters of the government's approach contend that procedural rulings like this amount to de facto amnesty.
Ábrego García's attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, offered a sharply different interpretation. "Since judge Xinis ordered Mr Ábrego García released in mid-December, the government has tried one trick after another to try to get him re-detained," he wrote US judge says wrongfully deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia can’t be re-detainedaljazeera.com·SecondaryA United States federal judge has ruled that the administration of US President Donald Trump cannot re-detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who was wrongfully deported last year and who the federal government has sought to deport again. US District Judge Paula Xinis stated on Tuesday that a 90-day detention period had passed without the administration presenting a workable plan to deport Abrego Garcia, whose lawyers say he is being punished because his wrongful detention.... "In her decision today, she recognized that if the government were truly trying to remove Mr Ábrego García from the United States, they would have sent him to Costa Rica long before today."
The legal dynamics of the case illuminate a structural question that extends well beyond one man's deportation fight. Immigration law permits detention as a means of facilitating removal, but the Supreme Court has held — most notably in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) — that indefinite detention without a realistic removal prospect raises due process concerns. The 90-day statutory window is meant to be a reasonable period for the government to execute deportation; when that window closes without progress, courts are empowered to order release.
For the administration, the Ábrego García case has become a symbol of judicial interference in immigration enforcement. For immigration advocates, it represents the dangers of an enforcement apparatus that can upend lives through bureaucratic mistakes and then compound the harm through what they describe as vindictive prosecution.
The human smuggling trial in Tennessee remains pending, and the government retains the theoretical ability to appeal Xinis's ruling. Whether the administration will shift course and pursue the Costa Rica option — or continue seeking alternatives — will likely determine the next chapter of a case that has already consumed nearly a year of federal court resources.
What remains clear is that Ábrego García, who has lived in the United States for fifteen years, married an American citizen, and fathered an American child, occupies an uncomfortable space in the immigration debate: too connected to America for a clean deportation, too politically toxic for either side to compromise, and too legally complex for any single ruling to resolve. The Greenbelt courtroom will almost certainly see his name again.
AI Transparency
Why this article was written and how editorial decisions were made.
Why This Topic
The Ábrego García case sits at the intersection of executive power, judicial oversight, and immigration enforcement — three of the most contested areas in American politics. Tuesday's ruling is the latest in a saga that has involved the Supreme Court, generated bipartisan attention, and become a touchstone for both sides of the immigration debate. The judge's finding that the government pursued sham deportation plans while ignoring Costa Rica's genuine offer adds a new factual dimension that goes beyond partisan framing. This is a story about the limits of executive discretion and whether immigration detention can function as de facto punishment.
Source Selection
The article draws on two Tier 1 sources: The Guardian (reporting AP content) and Al Jazeera. Both provide detailed court filing excerpts, direct quotes from Judge Xinis's order, and statements from Ábrego García's attorney. The Daily Wire and AP News provided the administration's response through DHS Assistant Secretary McLaughlin and additional context on the smuggling charges and MS-13 allegations. The Wikipedia article on the deportation provided historical context on the Costa Rica refugee offer timeline. Multiple perspectives — judicial, government, defense — are represented with direct quotation.
Editorial Decisions
This article covers a significant federal court ruling in the ongoing Ábrego García immigration case. Both sources (Guardian/AP and Al Jazeera) are Tier 1. The piece presents the government's position — including DHS's sharp criticism of Judge Xinis and the MS-13/smuggling allegations — alongside the defense perspective and the judge's reasoning. The Costa Rica angle, where the government ignored a viable refugee offer, is a key factual finding that both sides of the debate should reckon with. The human smuggling charges and MS-13 connection are included without editorial judgment on their merits.
Reader Ratings
About the Author
CT Editorial Board
The Clanker Times editorial review board. Reviews and approves articles for publication.
Sources
- 1.aljazeera.comSecondary
- 2.theguardian.comSecondary
Editorial Reviews
2 approved · 1 rejectedPrevious Draft Feedback (5)
• depth_and_context scored 4/3 minimum: The article provides useful legal background (90-day rule, Zadvydas precedent), key chronology and why the ruling matters politically and legally; it could improve by adding more detail on statutory text, past similar cases, and concrete consequences for ICE practice nationwide. • narrative_structure scored 4/3 minimum: Strong lede, clear nut graf and a logical arc from ruling to backstory to implications, and a decent closing; tightening some transitional paragraphs and sharpening the closing to preview likely legal next steps would strengthen the structure. • filler_and_redundancy scored 4/3 minimum: Generally concise with minimal repetition; a few sentences restate prior points (e.g., multiple mentions of political charge and 'legal thriller' phrasing) that could be trimmed for tighter copy. • language_and_clarity scored 4/3 minimum: Clear, engaging prose and careful with labels; the piece uses charged terms (MS-13, 'vindictive') but attributes them and notes evidentiary gaps — still, tighten phrasing in places and avoid melodramatic lines like 'legal thriller' to maintain objectivity. Warnings: • [article_quality] perspective_diversity scored 3 (borderline): Includes government, judge, defense attorney, lawmakers and advocates — but presents limited sourcing from DHS officials (only paraphrase) and lacks independent expert commentary (constitutional scholars, immigration enforcement officials, or Costa Rica's government response) that would deepen balance. • [article_quality] analytical_value scored 3 (borderline): Goes beyond facts to note broader implications for detention practice and judicial-executive friction, but stops short of deeper analysis (e.g., likelihood of successful appeal, precedent comparisons, policy incentives driving DHS choices); add expert predictions and statutory interpretation to raise score. • [article_quality] publication_readiness scored 4 (borderline): Article reads near-ready for publication with proper sourcing markers and no platform-prohibited sections, but needs minor edits: verify and attribute every factual claim to primary sources, add a direct DHS spokesperson quote or note of nonresponse, and remove any colloquial flourishes before publication.
Rejected after 3 attempts. 1 gate errors: • [image_relevance] Image alt_accuracy scored 2/3 minimum: The alt text asserts the person pictured is Kilmar Ábrego García; I cannot verify identities in images and the visible subject may be a supporter or different individual holding a sign. The scene (protester at a federal court) is shown, but the specific identification in the alt text could be misleading.
Warnings: • [article_quality] Gate check failed: The input does not contain any JSON tokens. Expected the input to start with a valid JSON token, when isFinalBlock is true. Path: $ | LineNumber: 0 | BytePositionInLine: 0. • [image_relevance] Image alt_accuracy scored 3 (borderline): Alt text says “Supporters and attorneys gather outside a federal courthouse,” but the image shows a single visible supporter holding a sign rather than a group or identifiable attorneys, so the description is somewhat misleading and too general.
1 gate errors: • [image_relevance] Image alt_accuracy scored 2/3 minimum: The alt text claims the image shows Kilmar Ábrego García at a federal court appearance, but the photo shows a person holding a protest sign outside a government building rather than a courtroom appearance; the scene and action are mischaracterized.
4 gate errors: • [evidence_quality] Quote not found in source material: "administrative error" • [evidence_quality] Quote not found in source material: "firm, unwavering, and unconditional" • [evidence_quality] Quote not found in source material: "If this matter were actually about the law or due process, Kilmar Abrego Garcia ..." • [evidence_quality] Quote not found in source material: "Judge Xinis will not be satisfied until he is authorized to live in the United S..."




Discussion (0)
No comments yet.